We must not limit our focus to any particular group, organization, or time period, when observing social injustice.  We must not be enrolled into the idea that any particular embodiment (in time/place) is any more than a symptom.  We must not confuse cause with example of.  “The problem”, is not the slavery of blacks in America, the oppression of minority cultures in East Africa, the misogyny of women in last years Super Bowl commercials, but that oppression, misuse, or exploitation exists, at all.  We witness the continued re-occurrence of these “social ills”, always in some form of justified backlash, or attempt to rebalance.  The end-game of positive social engineering must be the cessation of abuse, not the repackaging of it.  What I see, and what I feet to be the case, is the mistaken believe that pain can end pain, that payback and entitlement can lead to equality and harmony.  As in war, no amount of killing really works.  The questions remains: Can we institutionalize change?  What are the goals of social engineering?  Is there a common denominator that will have all parties choose (i.e. free will/choice vs force and punishment) to put aside being right for the sake of peace and integration?

PLEASE IGNORE ALL VIDEO ADDS BELOW THIS BLOG

PLEASE IGNORE ALL VIDEO ADDS BELOW THIS BLOG